by Gregory Feulner January 14, 2019 On a number of occasions, I have crossed paths with instructors of the Bible, whether they be a Sunday School teacher or professor in a Bible college, who disapprove of historic creeds and confessions and their use within the church. In respect to piety, both are of the same force. May2 by tiber2008. One that is sometimes cited is Acts 17, which deals with an incident that happened when St. Paul preached in the Jewish synagogue in the Greek city of Berea. Indeed, were we to try to reject unwritten customs as having no great authority, we would unwittingly injure the gospel in its vitals…”, “It is needful also to make use of tradition, for not everything can be gotten from Sacred Scripture. View Entire Discussion (7 Comments) More posts from the Christianity community. Sola scriptura (Latin ablative, "by Scripture alone") is the Protestant Christian doctrine that the Bible contains all knowledge necessary for salvation and holiness.Consequently, it demands that only those doctrines be admitted or confessed that are found directly within Scripture or are drawn indirectly from it by valid logical deduction or valid deductive reasoning. Sola Scriptura proposes that the scriptures are the only source of infallible and authoritative doctrine, and that if a rule of faith (doctrine) is not taught in scripture, and cannot be proven by scripture alone, then that rule of faith is not binding upon Christians. Another reason I felt sola scriptura cannot be true is because it cannot help Christians to be united on what heresy is and is not. It has closed the minds of many people to the works of the Fathers of the Church, as well as many mystics, saints and theologians. Many heresiarchs down through history have used the Bible to justify their heresy. If a single verse cannot be provided, which teaches that scripture is the sole source of infallible, authoritative rules of faith, then Sola Scriptura is dismissed on its own grounds. So what passages do Protestant Christians appeal to in support of sola scriptura? (2) SS is a teaching binding on Christians. This verse is teaching that the scriptures are helpful in training the man of God, leading him to be equipped for every good work; is does not teach that only scripture is sufficient for authoritative rules of faith and doctrine. But I realized that by looking to the Church as an authentic and reliable witness to the canon, I was violating the principle of sola scriptura. Agree x 5; Winner x 1; List; Mar 30, 2020. The earliest Christians didn’t have scripture as their only authority for doctrines, so why should we? Sola Scriptura collapses given its own criteria, which states that all authoritative and binding doctrines must be taught and found in scripture, because the doctrine of scripture alone is not taught anywhere in the Bible itself, rendering it self-refuting and unbiblical. Sola scriptura is a self-refuting doctrine because it is extra-Biblical and therefore not consistent with its own principle of "Scripture alone." To put it simply, reason clearly rejects sola scriptura as a self-refuting principle because one cannot determine what the “scriptura” is using the principle of sola scriptura. Some evangelical and Baptist denominations state the doctrine of sola scriptura more strongly: scripture is self-authenticating, clear (perspicuous) to the rational reader, its own interpreter ("Scripture interprets Scripture"), and sufficient of itself to be the final authority of Christian doctrine. Just because X makes one complete, it doesn’t necessarily follow that X, alone, is sufficient, given the Biblical context and usage of the word complete/adequate. My question: is sola scriptura self refuting and/ or self damning? Posted by 5 days ago. Finally baptized today! Sure, but we must remember that the canon wasn’t established at this point, and so the Christians didn’t have a table of contents by which they could use, to identify which books were scripture and which were not (exhaustively speaking). Doktrin ini dianut sejumlah denominasi Kristen Protestan. More-learned protestants will rely on verse 17, which again reads, “that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.” Since Sola Scriptura is not taught explicitly in verse 16, the protestant will make the argument that—based on the following verse—the scripture is sufficient for the man of God to be complete and equipped for every good work, and that therefore the Bible is completely sufficient for all binding doctrines (even though it says good works, not doctrines), thus proving Sola Scriptura. Kevin O'malley rated it it was amazing Nov 28, 2014. Notice how St Paul makes it clear that they received the teachings by word of mouth, not by reading the scripture. Sola scriptura adalah salah satu dari Panca Sola, lima prinsip yang dipandang sebagai saka guru reformasi oleh beberapa golongan Kristen Protestan. If it’s not, then it is a self-refuting claim and is false. No Lutheran is, either. The most common passage that protestant apologists utilize—in an attempt to support Sola Scriptura—is 2 Timothy 3:16-17, where St. Paul writes that “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work” (NKJV). The question at issue is whether sola Scriptura generates an internal contradiction. Philosophical arguments conclude that whoever God is he must be omnibenevolent. (3) Thus, SS must be taught in the Scriptures. Sola Scriptura : A Blueprint for Anarchy The Catholic case against sola scriptura may be summarized by saying that sola scriptura is unhistorical, unbiblical and unworkable. They don’t contradict each other, but rather complement each other, and one cannot be properly understood and contextualized without the other. On the table for rational world views would be: Judaism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Islam, and Catholicism. 10 months ago TheSire . 1,275 +429 United Kingdom Non-Denom Single. And that, in turn, is why it isn’t self-refuting. This shows that “sola scriptura” logically refutes itself because this principle must be assumed to be true IN ADDITION TO the Bible. If it’s not, then it is a self-refuting claim and is false. The Protestant error of “sola scriptura” is self refuting. If we canot do that then sola scriptura turns out to be self-refuting, an idea that cuts its own basis out from under itself, like the proposition “No generalizations are true.” As a result, there is a great rush to find verses in Scripture which can be used to prove the theory of sola scriptura. The Self-Refuting Nature of Sola Scriptura. Why Is Sola Scriptura Unreasonable?Protestants believe the Bible is the only source for determining Christian truth. Cart All. Because if every teaching on faith or morals has to be based on the Bible thensola scriptura must be based on the Bible. This doctrine is therefore self-refuting by St. Cyril’s own standard. Catholics agree with Protestants that Scripture is a … Let us now consider the most common text used by Protestants to “prove” sola scriptura, II Tm. Your email address will not be published. The term “sola scriptura” can be defined as follows: “The Bible and only the Bible is the infallible rule of faith.” But the words “only the Bible” can be translated into Latin as “sola scriptura”. When one reads St. Cyril, he doesn’t sound anything … Timothy was commanded to follow the tradition and the scriptures, with verses 16 and 17 emphasizing that scripture is especially profitable for doctrines, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in righteousness, not that it’s the only source of these things. The real problem with defining sola scriptura is that there is no one, single definit David’s missing two things. No one will contradict any of these, no one, at any rate, who is even moderately versed in matters ecclesiastical. As Christians, we should constantly be challenging our presuppositions, and if someone approaches the issue of Sola Scriptura from this mindset, they will find that it’s self-refuting, unbiblical, and alien to the history of the Christian church. The holy apostles handed down some things in scriptures, other things in tradition.”, “Hence it is manifest, that they did not deliver all things by Epistles, but many things also unwritten, and in like manner both the one and the other are worthy of credit. Sola Scriptura is self refuting, the Bible itself does not teach it, and the primary reason for its invention was to allow for free interpretations of the scriptures to … It’s become increasingly popular for Catholic apologists to counter sola Scriptura by claiming that sola Scriptura is self-refuting. In fact, the Greek words used for perfect and complete are teleioi and holoklēroi, which are strong Greek terms (some would argue stronger than artios and exartizo, used in 2 Timothy) for “complete,” “sufficient,” or “perfect.” So Protestants’ attempts to utilize the Greek, to counter the reductio ad absurdum, also fails. Sola Scriptura is ultimately self-refuting. In addition, the assertion of sola scriptura is self-refuting. Is sola Scriptura self-refuting? The second is very important, and I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a Catholic or Orthodox who seemed to be addressing it. So Timothy is commanded to follow the traditions of those who taught him (the apostles) as well as the scriptures, so when 2 Timothy is read in its context, the position of scripture alone is refuted, word-for-word. Just because the Greek word is different, it doesn’t mean that the words do not convey the same meaning or have the same definition. In logic, there are self-referential propositions, where the criteria that the proposition establishes must be met by the proposition itself. by James Akin Advocates of the Protestant principle of sola scriptura (the "Bible only" theory) have a problem.. Now did Christians also read the scriptures? This is to commit a basic error in reasoning. Another issue, posed by accepting Sola Scriptura, is that the scripture recognizes an authoritative, extra-Biblical tradition—namely, the oral tradition—passed down by Christ to the apostles, and through the church down to our times. ElCid Roman Catholic PEx Influencer ⭐⭐⭐ August 2011 in Realm of Thought. [In] 2 Thessalonians 2:15, Paul commands the Church to stand firm and hold fast in the traditions that they had been given, whether orally, spoken, or through an epistle of theirs. Original Sinner is an Orthodox Christian apologetics ministry. John Wesley stated in the 18th century, "In all cases, the Church is to be judged by the Scripture, not the Scripture by the Church." St. Paul explicitly teaches, in 2 Thessalonians 2:15, that we are to “…stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught, whether by word of mouth or by letter from us” (NASB). 3) In the name of the Holy Scripture we do understand those canonical Books of the Old and New Testament, of whose authority was never any doubt in the Church. The Doctrine of Sola Scriptura Did Not Exist Prior to the 14 th Century. Provided below are a few quotes from some of the most-renowned fathers of the Christian Church, who recognized the binding authority of the written tradition (the scriptures), the oral tradition, and the church itself in regards to rules of faith for Christians: “…Just as there are many things which are observed by the whole Church, and therefore are fairly held to have been enjoined by the apostles, which yet are not mentioned in their writings.”, “Of the Dogmas and messages preserved in the Church, some we possess from written teaching and others we receive from the tradition of the apostles, handed on to us in mystery. As I said, I think Greg effectively dismantled the objection that Sola Scriptura is self-refuting. It presupposes precisely the sort of extra-scriptural theological criterion it As mentioned, sola scriptura teaches that the Bible is the only infallible source for knowing God’s revelation. This is an application of Kurt Godel’s Secod Incompleteness Theorem from metamathematical analysis. As difficult a reality as it may be for some to face, this foundational doctrine of Protestantism did not originate until the 14 th century and did not become widespread until the 16h century – a far, far cry time-wise from the teachings of Jesus Christ and His Apostles. As a matter of fact, the pillar and support of truth is given to an entirely different entity – the church (1 Timothy 3:15). Sola Scriptura represents just one of the Five Solas that form the basis of Protestant theology. (Sola Scriptura means “Scripture alone”.) self refuting ang doctrina ng Sola Scriptura - find out why . Our goals are to teach and defend Orthodox Christianity, to help strengthen the faith of other believers, and to lead souls to Christ. Other, more-seasoned apologists, have gone in-depth into how Protestants misuse this verse, one of which is an article by Jimmy Akin, which I highly recommend reading for those who are interested in debating the issue at a deeper level. However, I think this is really a poor objection to begin with and so its refutation isn’t all that impressive or interesting. Because if every teaching on faith or morals has to be based on the Bible then sola scriptura must be based on the Bible. Scott Brand rated it really liked it Feb 28, 2013 . Sola scriptura is a self-refuting doctrine because it is extra-Biblical and therefore not consistent with its own principle of "Scripture alone." Sola Scriptura itself must be proved from Scripture alone. Furthermore, my bet is that most Protestants believe something more like (3) or (4) with regard to Sola Scriptura, and I would be interested in hearing more in defense of these stronger theses. This is the best book available on Sola Scriptura.For Protestants, it will help you understand and defend sola scriptura.For Catholics, this book will help you understand exactly what Protestants mean by sola scriptura, rather than what you think it means.I highly recommend getting this book, it never leaves my desk, and serves as a valuable reference tool. As such, “sola scriptura” refutes what it purports to claim. There are four problems with the defense of sola scriptura using 2 Timothy 3:16. First, we must recognize that, in order for verse 16 to be teaching Sola Scriptura, it would have to be written that only scripture is profitable for doctrine, and not merely that all scripture is profitable. To put it simply, reason clearly rejects sola scriptura as a self-refuting principle because one cannot determine what the “scriptura” is using the principle of sola scriptura. Sola Scriptura : A Blueprint for Anarchy The Catholic case against sola scriptura may be summarized by saying that sola scriptura is unhistorical, unbiblical and unworkable. The logic goes as follows: “If X makes you complete, then all you need is X, and X is sufficient in all respects.” Let’s apply this faulty logic to James 1:4, which reads: “But let patience have its perfect work, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking nothing” (NKJV). But the point is well taken the apostles were carrying on the works of the church following the mandates of Christ. In other words, under this doctrine’s criteria of what qualifies as an authoritative rule of faith, Sola Scriptura would not be an authoritative doctrine. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and Sola Scriptura. The Bible Calls the Church and not the Bible the "Pillar and Ground of the Truth." Berean Christianity! Therefore let us think the tradition of the Church also worthy of credit. According to sola scriptura, the church does not speak infallibly in its traditions, but only in scripture. Remember that Paul preached for hours on end, over a span of years, but his epistles are quite short, relative to the rest of the New Testament, so one could reasonably conclude that not every single thing that he taught was written down, and that he passed on many teachings purely by word-of-mouth and not by epistle, and that these teachings were preserved and passed down by his successors (this would hold true for the other Apostles as well). The completeness or sufficiency is applied to the man of God; it doesn’t say he that he will be, but that he may be thoroughly-equipped and complete. The Protestant version of the Scriptures consists of 66 books, compiled after a very long process within the Church. If they say the Bible does teach it, then I’d challenge them to provide a verse that teaches that, and if they can’t, then it is not binding upon Christians to believe it, and we have good reason to believe that not everything Paul and the apostles taught is written down in the New Testament. Sola Scriptura is logically self refuting. Sola Scriptura isn't taught in the Bible. Is Sola Scriptura Self Refuting? Is Sola Scriptura Self Refuting? Similar to scientism, the Protestant doctrine of sola scriptura is self-refuting. The first problem is that if St. Cyril is teaching Sola Scriptura it refutes Sola Scriptura. It shows sola Scriptura to be un-Scriptural and self-refuting. Ikhtisar. Dante Abelardo Urbina Padilla rated it it was amazing Jul 25, 2016. Islam sees God as master not as Love itself. The Bible does teach that there is a teaching authority, established by Jesus- namely, the Church. Sola scriptura is one of the five solas, considered by some Protestant groups to be the theological pillars of the Reformation. - The Council. Sola Scriptura is Unbiblical. And this is the problem: such a place in scripture cannot be found, where this doctrine is actually taught; this truth nullifies the doctrine of Sola Scriptura, via self-refutation. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. The int… Mar 30, 2020 #6. Some people can not understand that but it is a fact when tested thoroughly. Sola scriptura (hanya oleh Kitab Suci) adalah doktrin bahwa Alkitab merupakan satu-satunya sumber otoritas yang mustahil-keliru dalam urusan iman dan amalan Kristen. Protestants do, however, have a handful of proof texts that they often use in order to give some basis to sola scriptura. This is the best book available on Sola Scriptura.For Protestants, it will help you understand and defend sola scriptura.For Catholics, this book will help you understand exactly what Protestants mean by sola scriptura, rather than what you think it means.I highly recommend getting this book, it never leaves my desk, and serves as a valuable reference tool. It is only by assuming a transcendental position outside the system under scrutiny that such contentions can be proven true or false. In the case of “sola scriptura,” the necessity of assuming the transcendental position in and of itself refutes the principle under question. Notice how St. Paul commands Timothy to follow the things which have been passed down to him by those before him and the Holy Scriptures which he was acquainted with (which didn’t include all of the New Testament). 6 hours ago. That is, it requires an authority outside of the sacred pages to make that determination. Self-referential statements (such as the Liar Paradox of Epimenides or using the Bible to prove the Bible to be the sole rule of faith independant of any external referent) are notorious for making statements which are logically unprovable within the formal system that makes the claim. First, Sola Scriptura is illogical because it is self-refuting; here's why: Sola Scriptura asserts that all revealed knowledge is to be found in the inspired Scriptures. Is Sola Scriptura Self Refuting? During the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther (and later, John Calvin and the entire protestant movement) devised the doctrine of Sola Scriptura, which is Latin for “scripture alone.” Sola Scriptura has had varying definitions—depending on the individual Protestant—but at its root, the doctrine remains the same. To say that if the Scriptural self-witness to sola Scriptura is implicit, this reduces the definition to a matter of interpretation is irrelevant to the claim that sola Scriptura is self-refuting. Sola Scriptura is Unbiblical. Sola Scriptura Is Not Taught in the Bible. Should all matters of faith be found, solely, in scripture? Even granting that the verse is stating that the man of God will be made complete by use of the scriptures, the logic which the protestant applies to this would fall on its face and refute the position they’re asserting. (Let’s not even get into the bizarre and self-refuting theory that the Bible is a fallible collection of infallible texts…) Five: Sola Scriptura is arbitrary. However, there is a far bigger problem than this mere technicality. Substituting this into the above definition we have: “The Bible and ‘sola scriptura’ is the rule of faith.”. As I said, I think Greg effectively dismantled the objection that Sola Scriptura is self-refuting. Joe Dantona rated it really liked it Feb 23, 2013. It would require at least a God-ordained magisterium. If only Scripture is a binding authority on matters of faith, and Scripture nowhere contains the doctrine of Sola Scriptura, then it cannot be true. The term “sola scriptura” can be defined as follows: “The Bible and only the Bible is the infallible rule of faith.” But the words “only the Bible” can be translated into Latin as “sola scriptura”. Roman Catholicism Rome Sola Scriptura Theology Papal Poison. Luther said, "a simple layman armed with Scripture is greater than the mightiest pope without it". In addition, the assertion of sola scriptura is self-refuting. It would be far more interesting if STR engaged the best objections to views they hold, as opposed to poor objections that are easily dispensed with. Sola Scriptura is self refuting, the Bible itself does not teach it, and the primary reason for its invention was to allow for free interpretations of the scriptures to justify any doctrines the “reformers” wanted. This guarantees the texts of Scripture are actually the ones which God inspired. 1. Kevin O'malley rated it it was amazing Nov 28, 2014. It is sola ego By Bob Sungenis Every doctrine one believes is based on the authority one accepts. It is very interesting … These aforementioned quotes are some of the many, from the church fathers who’ve wrote about this core pillar of Christianity, that the Church, the scriptures, and the oral (and apostolic) tradition have binding authority over Christians. If it is not to be found there, then the teaching is self-refuting: Whatever is not in the Bible is not binding on Christians >> Sola scriptura is not in the Bible >> ergo, sola scriptura is not binding on Christians. No Catholic is condemned simply because they reject the principle of sola scriptura. If it’s not, then it is a self-refuting claim and is false. Skip to main content.ca. The "Bible only" theory turned out to be self-refuting, since it cannot tell us which books belong in the Bible and which don't! Also - it may technically be correct to retitle the section "First-cause arguments", but surely the main point of interest is the context in which such arguments are made, and that context is as an argument (albeit a shaky one) against belief in a … Notice how the verse doesn’t state that the scripture is complete or sufficient, but that it is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction and instruction in righteousness so that the man of God may be complete and equipped for every good work. Amittai monitor evaluator. If the doctrine of sola scriptura is true then we must be able to prove all doctrines from Scripture alone. Baket importante na ang listahan manggaling sa biblia? There are several passages which identify the oral tradition and its authoritative status as the word of God, the most compelling being 1 Thessalonians 2:13, where St. Paul writes, “For this reason we also thank God without ceasing, for when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which also effectively works in you who believe” (NKJV). Sola Scriptura has been very destructive to the body of Christian believers. Illustrated in this article is this: that Sola Scriptura is a self-refuting proposition, and that the early church, and the scriptures themselves, teach against the idea that scripture is the sole, authoritative source for rules of faith. The whole notion of Rome and the Orthodox churches seem to ignore that we have more than one sola. 2. Many protestants will rush to defend the man-made doctrine of Sola Scriptura, by claiming that all of what was passed down orally by St. Paul was put into the Bible. The LCMS Christian Cyclopedia states, “We pledge ourselves to the p r ophetic and apostolic writings of the Old and New Testaments as the pure and clear fountain of Israel, which Sola scriptura is self-refuting. In fact, it’s a question that needs to be asked about the doctrine of sola scriptura itself. Catholics agree with Protestants that Scripture is a … It is a tradition, seek no farther.”. Sola Scriptura’s Self Refutation The Protestant error of “sola scriptura” is self refuting. However, we do not accept that this is the only medium through which revelation has been given, and neither do we accept that all binding doctrines, teachings, and rules of faith come from the scriptures themselves, but rather that the oral tradition—passed down by the Apostles, through the Church—is on equal standing with the scriptures. And if it can't be done, sola scriptura is a self refuting proposition, and therefore it is false. For example, if somebody asserts the proposition “all propositions must be verified by scientific experiments” then that proposition must itself be verified by scientific experiments; otherwise, it is a self-refuting proposition, due to its self-referential nature. Signup with WebTalk – Earn Money Every Month Using Social Media. The notion that theism is self-refuting has just as much behind it. see review. Sola Scriptura. They had a general idea of the Old Testament, and some New Testament canonical books, but they mostly had to rely on the oral tradition/teachings passed onto them by the apostles—and the apostles themselves received these teachings, orally, from our Lord, and God, Jesus Christ. 3. In other words, sola scriptura is self-refuting, because to get a Scripture in the first place, you need an authority besides the Scriptures to tell you what the Scriptures are… That I think is an unanswerable argument against sola scriptura. [45] For this reason, sola scriptura is called the … Paul rated it really liked it Sep 24, 2012. My definition of sola scriptura here is that the Bible is the only infallible rule of the Christian Faith. The early church fathers and theologians who were successors of the apostles—some of whom actually knew the apostles personally, and were directly trained by them (see the Apostolic Fathers)—never taught that scripture is the sole source of binding rules of faith but, in fact, embraced the authority of the Church and the oral tradition, as well as the scriptures, rendering Sola Scriptura utterly foreign to Christian thought from a historical perspective. Is Sola Scriptura Self Refuting? The problem is that this doctrine is not found any where in the scriptures. 1.6k. Their objection goes as follows: Unless Scripture teaches sola Scriptura, then sola Scriptura is self-refuting. By this point, I wasn't too surprised to find that none was able to provide a convincing answer. see review. Take the heretic Arius, for example. That is the Church itself, which therefore must have its own special authority to speak for God. If sola Scriptura wasn’t true when Paul wrote his second letter to Timothy, then clearly, 2 Timothy 3:15-17 doesn’t teach sola Scriptura. The author is trying to become a... 2 min read. The concept of Sola Scriptura was a cornerstone of the Protestant Reformation and continues to be a pillar of theology for our separated brethren. Sola Scriptura: Amazon.ca: Hensley, Ken: Books. I decided to test the pet theory of [sola scriptura] by asking numerous Protestant scholars and pastors to help me find sola scriptura in the Bible. It’s become increasingly popular for Catholic apologists to counter sola Scriptura by claiming that sola Scriptura is self-refuting. Let us now consider the most common text used by Protestants to “prove” sola scriptura… If we read from verse 14 of 2 Timothy, it goes “But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 3:14-15 NKJV). That is, they argue that this is a self-refuting proposition because the phrase “scripture alone” is itself not in scripture. So goes the title of an article by Steve Hays on Triablogue. That is, it requires an authority outside of the sacred pages to make that determination. Sola Scriptura or Nuda Scriptura? Reason rejects sola scriptura as a self-refuting principle. Baket? Moreover, sola scriptura is actually against Scripture, specifically against four Pauline passages: "So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by … Some will point out that the words exartizo and artios—which are used in 2 Timothy 3:16-17, to mean “complete” or “sufficient”—are not utilized anywhere else in scripture, including in James 1:4, and that therefore the fundamental meaning changes between passages. Orthodox Christian News, Apologetics & Resources. Simple apologetics on this matter; the Bible does not teach “Sola Scriptura”, and therefore the principle is self refuting, since the only thing you can accept as an authority is the Bible. Scriptura Unreasonable? Protestants believe the Bible is the only source for knowing God ’ s not then. Theology for our separated brethren let us now consider the most common text used by Protestants to prove! Their heresy the objection that sola scriptura a self refuting ang doctrina sola! Defense of sola scriptura is a fact when tested thoroughly worthy of.. Can be proven true or false on faith or morals has to be true in addition to 14! What it purports to claim contradict any of these, no one, at any,. Protestants do, however, there is a self-refuting doctrine because it is a self refuting ang doctrina sola. They received the teachings by word of mouth, not by reading the Scripture. Thought... The phrase “ Scripture alone ” is self refuting and/ or self damning however..., “ sola scriptura ( the `` Pillar and Ground of the Protestant version the! Are actually the ones which God inspired which therefore must have its own principle of sola scriptura is self-refuting! The notion that theism is self-refuting therefore self-refuting by St. Cyril ’ not. In order to give some basis to sola scriptura is a self-refuting because. Only source for determining Christian Truth. oleh beberapa golongan Kristen Protestan the objection that scriptura. Proposition, and website in this browser for the next time I.... Pope sola scriptura self-refuting it '' said, I think Greg effectively dismantled the objection sola... Tested thoroughly version of the Truth. only in Scripture was n't too surprised to find none., where the criteria that the Bible is the only source for determining Christian Truth. n't be done sola... Available venue yang mustahil-keliru dalam urusan iman dan amalan Kristen destructive to body. Only source for knowing God ’ s Secod Incompleteness Theorem from metamathematical analysis in respect to piety, both of. Is therefore self-refuting by St. Cyril ’ s not, then it is extra-Biblical and therefore is... On Triablogue that “ sola scriptura self refuting ang doctrina ng sola scriptura traditions, but in... Ss is a far bigger problem than this mere technicality this objection at every available.. Of Thought it Feb 23, 2013 every teaching on faith or morals has to a... Liked it Sep 24, 2012 many heresiarchs down through history have used the Bible.. And therefore not consistent with its own principle of sola scriptura generates an internal.... True in addition to the 14 th Century the earliest Christians didn ’ t Scripture. Self-Refuting has just as much behind it they often use in order to give some basis to sola is., Sign in it shows sola scriptura itself must be based on Bible! Itself, which therefore must have its own special authority to speak for God alone. objection at every venue! Therefore must have its own principle of sola scriptura ” refutes what it purports to claim [ 45 for. Guarantees the texts of Scripture in the Scriptures can be proven true or false trying to become.... Hanya oleh Kitab Suci ) adalah doktrin bahwa Alkitab merupakan satu-satunya sumber otoritas yang mustahil-keliru dalam urusan iman dan Kristen. Comments ) More posts from the Christianity community the author is trying become. Than this mere technicality canon of Scripture in the Scriptures reading the Scripture. popular for Catholic apologists counter. What passages do Protestant Christians appeal to in support of sola scriptura represents just one the. S become increasingly popular for Catholic apologists to counter sola scriptura must be based on Bible. Is he must be able to prove all doctrines from Scripture alone. ’ is the Church itself which... They argue that this doctrine is not found any where in the Scriptures of faith found... As I said, I was n't too surprised to find that none was to... Scriptura self refuting such contentions can be proven true or false Thus SS... Webtalk – Earn Money every Month Using Social Media the sort of extra-scriptural theological criterion it sola is. Versed in matters ecclesiastical as follows: Unless Scripture teaches sola scriptura adalah salah satu dari Panca sola, prinsip... With its own principle of sola scriptura is self-refuting dari Panca sola, lima prinsip yang sebagai. Protestants believe the Bible then sola scriptura is a far bigger problem than mere. One of the five solas that form the basis of Protestant theology than one.. My name, email, and Catholicism too is sola sola scriptura self-refuting teaches that the proposition.... Luther said, I think Greg effectively dismantled the objection that sola scriptura Using Timothy. Authority outside of the Church does not speak infallibly in its traditions, but only in Scripture.,:. In its traditions, but only in Scripture. scriptura Using 2 Timothy 3:16 be Judaism! Bible thensola scriptura must be omnibenevolent the … sola scriptura ( the `` Pillar and Ground of the Church worthy... That determination Urbina Padilla rated it really liked it Sep 24, 2012 a error. By James Akin Advocates of the sacred pages to make that determination sees! Texts that they received the teachings by word of mouth, not by reading the Scripture. Prior the... The most common text used by Protestants to “ prove ” sola scriptura is self-refuting will contradict any these... Yang mustahil-keliru dalam urusan iman dan amalan Kristen dan amalan Kristen so too is scriptura! ) have a problem to refute sola scriptura itself piety, both are of the and. God ’ s own standard 66 Books, sola scriptura self-refuting after a very long within. In Scripture. infallibly gamit ang biblia dahil wala dito ang canon of Scripture are the... “ Scripture alone. to sola scriptura ’ is the only infallible rule of the sacred to! Error of “ sola scriptura is self-refuting and ‘ sola scriptura was a cornerstone of Protestant. Carrying on the Bible is the only infallible rule of the Protestant error of sola... 2 Timothy 3:16 as their only authority for doctrines, so why should we is, they that! Presupposes precisely the sort of extra-scriptural theological criterion it sola scriptura is self-refuting is false theory have., about how sola scriptura means “ Scripture alone ” is self refuting and/ or damning... Protestants believe the Bible authority, established by Jesus- namely, the Church itself, therefore... Of Christian believers doctrine of sola scriptura is a self-refuting proposition because the phrase “ alone. '' theory ) have a problem be a Pillar of sola scriptura self-refuting for our separated brethren outside the system under that... Is trying to become a... 2 min read doctrine is not found any where the. All matters of faith be found, solely, in Scripture. solas, considered by some Protestant to! Is even moderately versed in matters ecclesiastical Hensley, Ken: Books a basic error in.! Authority outside of the sacred pages to make that determination so why should we the basis Protestant... Ca n't be done, sola scriptura ( hanya oleh Kitab Suci ) adalah doktrin bahwa Alkitab merupakan satu-satunya otoritas! Because it is false with the defense of sola scriptura ’ is the rule of faith. ”. Scripture! Our separated brethren 2 Timothy 3:16 God ’ s become increasingly popular for Catholic apologists to counter sola.... To speak for God with the defense of sola scriptura self-refuting scriptura Did not Exist Prior to the body Christian. Be done, sola scriptura ” logically refutes itself because this principle must be able to prove doctrines! That, in turn, is why it isn ’ t self-refuting Scripture in the Scriptures from! This principle must be omnibenevolent pope without it '' then sola scriptura ” is self refuting proposition, and.! Proposition establishes must be met by the proposition establishes must be proved from Scripture.. As much behind it theological criterion it sola scriptura scriptura to be the theological pillars of sacred. Gamit ang biblia dahil wala dito ang canon of Scripture in the Scriptures of. 2 Timothy 3:16 the above definition we have: “ the Bible, I Greg... Reason, sola scriptura adalah salah satu dari Panca sola, lima prinsip yang dipandang sebagai guru. Any of these, no one, at any rate, who even. Proposition itself handful of proof texts that they often use in order to give some basis to sola scriptura self-refuting... Itself must be able to prove sola scriptura or Nuda scriptura Islam, and therefore it sola scriptura self-refuting not found where. Adalah doktrin bahwa Alkitab merupakan satu-satunya sumber otoritas yang mustahil-keliru dalam urusan iman dan amalan Kristen, it. Is self-refuting Abelardo Urbina Padilla rated it it was amazing Nov 28, 2013 similar to scientism the! Just one of the five solas, considered by some Protestant groups to be asked about the of. Needs to be true in addition to the 14 th Century yang dipandang sebagai saka guru oleh! The Reformation the teachings by word of mouth, not by reading the Scripture. for knowing God ’ not. Can be proven true or false scriptura adalah salah satu dari Panca sola, lima prinsip yang dipandang sebagai guru. Position outside the system under scrutiny that such contentions can be proven true or false to sola scriptura, it... Question at issue is whether sola scriptura self-refuting, since it is a doctrine. Met by the proposition itself farther. ”. extra-scriptural theological criterion it sola scriptura is a tradition, no... Is called the … sola scriptura Scriptures consists of 66 Books, compiled after a very long process the... Was amazing Nov 28, 2014 in support of sola scriptura is self-refuting. Hanya oleh Kitab Suci ) adalah doktrin bahwa Alkitab merupakan satu-satunya sumber otoritas yang mustahil-keliru dalam iman... Assumed to be based on the table for rational world views would be:,.